Rajon Rondo: Flagrant Foul or No?

April 29th, 2009 at 9:19 am
By Chris


Yes, Paul Pierce saved the Celtics’ bacon, Rajon Rondo was great again and Kendrick Perkins was an absolute beast inside, however, the story today is was Rondo’s face-slap foul against Brad Miller a flagrant foul? Opinions are completely divided here. One expert says yes (Jalen Rose), another says no (Tim Legler). One popular blog says yes, another no. You get the picture. So which is it?

The rules concerning flagrant fouls state:

If contact committed against a player, with or without the ball, is interpreted to be unnecessary, a flagrant foul–penalty (1) will be assessed. A personal foul is charged to the offender and a team foul is charged to the team.

PENALTY:
(1) Two free throws shall be attempted and the ball awarded to the offended team on either side of the court at the free throw line extended.

(2) If the offended player is injured and unable to attempt his free throws, the opposing coach will select any player from the bench to attempt the free throws.

(3) This substitute may not be replaced until the ball is legally touched by a player on the court. (EXCEPTION: Rule 3–Section V–e.)

(4) The injured player may not return to the game.

(5) A player will be ejected if he commits two flagrant fouls in the same game.

There area also two degrees of flagrant fouls, with the flagrant two receiving the word “excessive” to go along with “unnecessary” in the NBA’s rules. Essentially, the rules leave the decision to the discretion of the officials. If they deem a foul flagrant, they call it so. Apparently, last night’s officials thought Rondo’s foul was necessary and not excessive — essentially, a good, hard-nosed playoff foul where a larger offensive player got hit by a smaller, quicker guard.

There’s also been a lot made about what would the call be if the tables were turned and it was Miller smacking Rondo across the face while trying to stop a game-tying layup. More than likely, Rondo would’ve been sprawled across the arena had the roles been reversed, and considering the dramatic effect of such a play, the officials would probably protect Rondo in that situation.

Clearly, the lesson is, if you are going to commit a hard foul while trying to avoid the flagrant ruling, make sure you are the smaller player fouling one of the bigs — and to all you bigs out there, if a smaller player hits you like that, go down in the most dramatic way you can think of.

Try channeling the Scarecrow from the Wizard of Oz, perhaps.

Bookmark and Share

3 Responses to “Rajon Rondo: Flagrant Foul or No?”

  1. Chris Says:

    Nice bit of a spin you have going here. This was no face slap foul. To be a slap you have to have an open hand. Rondo’s hand was a fist. So, what you really meant to write was “Rondo’s sucker punch foul” There, now we have it clearly.

  2. Chris Says:

    I’m not sure if it’s spin because I acknowledge the onus is on the referee. On film, it looks like it starts with open-handed. I’ve seen the pictures as the contact occurs, and yes, Rondo’s hand is closed.

    The reason I don’t think the flagrant was called was because of the size differential.

  3. Jibben Says:

    Damn, Brad took a hit. Definitely should be called with a flagrant. I mean come on man.. just look at it.. It’s like boom. Brad couldn’t even tell where he’s at.

Leave a Reply

Subscribe without commenting