<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Travis Henry Doesn&#8217;t Smoke Pot, Does Impregnate Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/</link>
	<description>Come Strong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:49:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad someone got that.  Ramathorn for the win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad someone got that.  Ramathorn for the win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Rigsby</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Rigsby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/#comment-36</guid>
		<description>Littering and... littering and... littering and smokin&#039; the reefer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Littering and&#8230; littering and&#8230; littering and smokin&#8217; the reefer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>so the question is, is Henry fighting so hard to keep his &quot;eligibility&quot; for the love of the game or his menagerie of children?  and yes, Denver loses out either way.  it has to be hard on a struggling franchise looking to cash in on a player that has about 2-3 more years of productivity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so the question is, is Henry fighting so hard to keep his &#8220;eligibility&#8221; for the love of the game or his menagerie of children?  and yes, Denver loses out either way.  it has to be hard on a struggling franchise looking to cash in on a player that has about 2-3 more years of productivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Lerza</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Lerza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/#comment-14</guid>
		<description>While the precision of polygraph tests is debatable, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.craigmedical.com/Hair_Drug-Test_FAQ.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hair follicle tests are as accurate as urinalysis&lt;/a&gt; - even more so if you take into consideration the fact that the results are much more difficult to manipulate. This doesn&#039;t change the fact that such tests are not currently recognized in the NFL&#039;s Collective Bargaining Agreement.  I&#039;m very interested to see how this new evidence is received by Goodell.

The real loser in this situation, regardless of the NFL&#039;s final decision, is the Denver Broncos.  Let&#039;s say the league denies the appeal.  If the Broncos cut Henry, they&#039;ll have to deal with a public relations nightmare in the form of a media outcry reminiscent of that for &lt;a href=&quot;http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3103651&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Troy Williamson&lt;/a&gt;.  If they don&#039;t cut Henry, they&#039;ll waste a roster spot while he awaits reinstatement.  And if the NFL decides he didn&#039;t violate the substance abuse policy after all, the Broncos have wasted a lot of time and resources on a back that is beyond his prime.

The real winner is Bud Adams if he is charging interest on the loans he gave Henry for child support while Henry was playing for the Titans.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While the precision of polygraph tests is debatable, <a href="http://www.craigmedical.com/Hair_Drug-Test_FAQ.htm" rel="nofollow">hair follicle tests are as accurate as urinalysis</a> &#8211; even more so if you take into consideration the fact that the results are much more difficult to manipulate. This doesn&#8217;t change the fact that such tests are not currently recognized in the NFL&#8217;s Collective Bargaining Agreement.  I&#8217;m very interested to see how this new evidence is received by Goodell.</p>
<p>The real loser in this situation, regardless of the NFL&#8217;s final decision, is the Denver Broncos.  Let&#8217;s say the league denies the appeal.  If the Broncos cut Henry, they&#8217;ll have to deal with a public relations nightmare in the form of a media outcry reminiscent of that for <a href="http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3103651" rel="nofollow">Troy Williamson</a>.  If they don&#8217;t cut Henry, they&#8217;ll waste a roster spot while he awaits reinstatement.  And if the NFL decides he didn&#8217;t violate the substance abuse policy after all, the Broncos have wasted a lot of time and resources on a back that is beyond his prime.</p>
<p>The real winner is Bud Adams if he is charging interest on the loans he gave Henry for child support while Henry was playing for the Titans.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:26:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/#comment-13</guid>
		<description>if Denver would get some receivers that aren&#039;t injury-prone, Shanahan might stay put as well...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if Denver would get some receivers that aren&#8217;t injury-prone, Shanahan might stay put as well&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Utter</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>David Utter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:15:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/nfl/travis-henry-doesnt-smoke-pot-does-impregnate-women/#comment-12</guid>
		<description>If the Broncos miss the playoffs, Henry might be with Denver next year. Shanahan, possibly not. Travis could hire the coach to manage his child support checks and schedule quality time with the kiddies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the Broncos miss the playoffs, Henry might be with Denver next year. Shanahan, possibly not. Travis could hire the coach to manage his child support checks and schedule quality time with the kiddies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
