<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Did Nadal/Federer Resurrect Men&#8217;s Tennis?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/</link>
	<description>Come Strong</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 20:49:41 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: David Utter</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/comment-page-1/#comment-1344</link>
		<dc:creator>David Utter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 10:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/#comment-1344</guid>
		<description>That explains why Roddick may be less than 100 percent focused on his backhand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That explains why Roddick may be less than 100 percent focused on his backhand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/comment-page-1/#comment-1340</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/#comment-1340</guid>
		<description>True, very true.  In fact, I doubt most casual fans will even be aware of the breathtaking match after today.  Next week, they won&#039;t even be able to tell you who won. 

As for Roddick, well, there&#039;s always Brooklyn Decker.

&lt;img src=&quot;http://www.intentionalfoul.com/images/brooklyndecker.jpg&quot;&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, very true.  In fact, I doubt most casual fans will even be aware of the breathtaking match after today.  Next week, they won&#8217;t even be able to tell you who won. </p>
<p>As for Roddick, well, there&#8217;s always Brooklyn Decker.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.intentionalfoul.com/images/brooklyndecker.jpg"/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Utter</title>
		<link>http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/comment-page-1/#comment-1339</link>
		<dc:creator>David Utter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 17:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.intentionalfoul.com/tennis/did-nadalfederer-resurrect-mens-tennis/#comment-1339</guid>
		<description>Great, great match, but outside of the annual passing interest in Wimbledon, no one&#039;s going to get excited in a college football/NFL way about the US Tennis Open. In other news, Roddick&#039;s still on the tour? Hasn&#039;t he become the US version of Tim Henman?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, great match, but outside of the annual passing interest in Wimbledon, no one&#8217;s going to get excited in a college football/NFL way about the US Tennis Open. In other news, Roddick&#8217;s still on the tour? Hasn&#8217;t he become the US version of Tim Henman?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
